Policy Development Process (PDP)
Revision History
|
ID: |
AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08 |
Date Submitted: 07 June 2019 Version: 8.0 Status: Expired |
|
|
Authors: |
|
||
Proposal
1.0 Summary of the Problem Being Addressed by this Policy Proposal
As Internet Number resources are finite, their allocation is based on the operational needs of end-users and Internet Services Providers, while avoiding stockpiling in accordance with RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation Policy CPM 5.5, IPv6 Allocation and assignment policy CPM 6.5 and Policy for Autonomous System Numbers (ASN) Management in the AFRINIC region CPM 7.0.Section 4 of the Registration Service Agreement (RSA) provides the framework for investigations of the usage of allocated Internet Number resources, defines members’ obligation to cooperate and the measures to be taken by AFRINIC in case of failure to comply. The lack of such investigation or regular control can lead to inefficient usage of the Internet Number resources, to stockpiling and other type of abuses.
2.0 Summary of How this Proposal Addresses the Problem
In order to ensure efficient and appropriate use of resources, AFRINIC shall conduct regular reviews of resource utilisation held by its members. This would allow recovery of any type of resource, where usage is not in compliance with the RSA. Those resources can be reallocated for better usage.
3.0 Proposal
The policy proposal will modify the CPM as follows:
Insert a section 13 to the CPM as follows:
|
13.0 Internet Number Resources Review Regular reviews of resource utilisation are conducted by AFRINIC to ensure efficient and appropriate usage of resources. This allows for recovery of any type of resource where usage is not in compliance with the RSA; to allow such resources to be reallocated for better usage. 13.1 The reviews shall be based on compliance with the terms outlined in the RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
13.2 The reviews cover all allocated/Assigned resources, but priority goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to two-octet ASN.
13.3 Classes of review: Members to be reviewed shall be selected according to the following classes: 13.3.1 Random The member is chosen by AFRINIC at random between the members who has not been reviewed for any other reasons in the preceding 24 months. 13.3.2 Selected Member is selected because of an internal report or due to a lack of contact between the AFRINIC and the member. 13.3.3 Reported: Here, members are reviewed either because: A) They have requested the review themselves or B) There has been a community complaint made against them that warrants investigation. Complaints shall be backed by evidence and AFRINIC staff shall evaluate the facts as appropriate to conduct the review. However this review is not applicable to a member with the same resources portfolio on which a full review has been completed in the preceding 24 months. AFRINIC staff may, at its sole discretion, after having assessed the nature of the evidence found in the community complaint, require that such evidence be (i) submitted in the form of a sworn affidavit or (ii) declared to be true before a Commissioner of Oath.
13.4 In case of non-compliance and if evidence has been established in accordance with:
AFRNIC shall initiate the resource recovery process on the portion of addresses found to be noncompliant. A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the organisation and correct any discrepancy towards the RSA. Except in cases of fraudulent resource acquisition or unlawful usage and abuse, the organization shall be given a minimum of six(6) months to effect the return of the resources. If the organisation is cooperative and working in good faith to substantially restore compliance or has a valid need for additional time to renumber out of the affected blocks, AFRINIC shall negotiate a longer term. The acceptance level of compliance and duration of the longer term are at AFRINIC staff discretion. B) If the situation cannot be rectified and the member did not transfer the resources to meet other AFRINIC-approved needs as per adopted policies AFRINIC shall publish the resources to be recovered for a period of three (3) months; during which the organisation may at any time, seek compliance or transfer the resources to other members After this period, the resource shall be recovered and therefore the records of the previous holder of the recovered resource shall be updated in AFRINIC’s databases. C) Any Internet Number Resources recovered under this policy may be assigned/allocated under existing Allocation and Assignment Policies.
13.5 Appeal procedure Reviewed members who are not satisfied have the right to appeal against the results on the review within the four weeks following communication of the results by AFRINIC. Appeals shall follow an arbitration process as provided for in the Code de Procedure Civile (Code of Civil Procedure) of the Republic of Mauritius. AFRINIC may, on request from an aggrieved party, suggest a pool of arbitrators who shall be knowledgeable volunteers from the community.
13.6 Compliance Report AFRINIC shall publish an annual meaningful report describing review activities, in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. |
4.0 Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ms Wafa Dahmani Zaafouri (become Afrinic GC Chair), Mr Serge ILUNGA (become Afrinic Board member) and Mr Alain P. Aina for their contributions in the development of this Policy proposal.
The authors also thank the community for the discussions and contributions.
Revision History
Revision History
|
Date |
Details |
|
29 may 2019 |
Version 08 AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT08
|
|
06 Apr 2019 |
Version 07
|
|
10 Apr 2018 |
Version 6.0
|
|
21 Oct 2017 |
Version 5.0
|
|
11 Apr 2017 |
Version 4.0
|
|
18 Nov 2016 |
Version 3.0
|
|
05 Aug 2016 |
Version 2.0
|
|
18 May 2016 |
Version 1.0
|